BREAKING NEWS
Supreme Court seems likely to uphold a federal law that could force TikTok to shut down on Jan. 19
Read full article: Supreme Court seems likely to uphold a federal law that could force TikTok to shut down on Jan. 19The Supreme Court seems likely to uphold a law that would ban TikTok in the United States beginning Jan. 19 unless the popular social media program is sold by its China-based parent company.
The Latest: Supreme Court seems likely to uphold a law that could ban TikTok in the US on Jan. 19
Read full article: The Latest: Supreme Court seems likely to uphold a law that could ban TikTok in the US on Jan. 19The Supreme Court seemed likely to uphold a law that would ban TikTok in the United States beginning Jan. 19 unless the popular social media program is sold by its China-based parent company.
TikTok's fate arrives at Supreme Court in collision of free speech and national security
Read full article: TikTok's fate arrives at Supreme Court in collision of free speech and national securityIn a collision between free speech and national security, the Supreme Court will hear arguments over the fate of TikTok, a digital age cultural phenomenon that roughly half the U.S. population uses for entertainment and information.
The Supreme Court seems likely to side with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Read full article: The Supreme Court seems likely to side with the Consumer Financial Protection BureauThe Supreme Court seems likely to preserve the work of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau against a conservative-led challenge.

Supreme Court to consider rights of asylum seekers
Read full article: Supreme Court to consider rights of asylum seekersGetty Images(CNN) - The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to take up a major immigration case concerning the rights of undocumented immigrants seeking asylum to challenge their expedited removal proceedings. The Trump administration had asked the court to review an opinion of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that would allow those who have been denied asylum the opportunity to make their claims in federal courts. Thuraissigiam applied for asylum, citing fear of persecution in Sri Lanka, and an asylum officer determined he had not established a credible fear of persecution. Thuraissigiam went to federal district court, arguing that the expedited removal violated his constitutional rights. A district court said the law did not authorize the court to hear his claims.

Matthew Shepard's parents slam William Barr
Read full article: Matthew Shepard's parents slam William BarrWASHINGTON, D.C. - The family of Matthew Shepard, a 21-year-old Wyoming man killed in a brutal homophobic attack in 1998, had sharp words for Attorney General William Barr in a speech delivered Wednesday at the Justice Department. Deitle delivered the speech written by Shepard's parents, Judy and Dennis, and apologized on the pair's behalf for missing the event, noting that they were traveling. Dreiband spoke earlier in the event about the Justice Department's commitment to prosecuting hate crimes. Hate Crimes Prevention Act was signed into law just under 10 years ago by President Barack Obama. It expanded a federal hate crimes law to include crimes motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.