FANTASY PLAYS: Players to start and sit for NFL Week 7

Full Screen
1 / 4

Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Dallas Cowboys' Tony Pollard is tackled by Philadelphia Eagles' Jordan Davis (90) during the first half of an NFL football game Sunday, Oct. 16, 2022, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

Another season of fantasy football, another group of start-or-sit scenarios to answer.

It’s not just enough to draft the right team and make the right moves off the waiver wire. We all know that. We also have to make sure that we are starting the right players each week.

Recommended Videos

Of course, we have our studs, anchors, and the players we’re starting virtually no matter what. We don’t need anyone to tell us to start Travis Kelce.

But, the further down the lineup we go, the more those questions trickle in.

Then again, no player is a “must-sit” in every scenario, and perhaps the WR3 you’ve been plugging in each week may have a better alternative.

To answer the question, “Should I sit Player X,” depends on the answer to the question, “Who can you start instead?”

That’s why I like to switch up the typical start-or-sit column format. I’m going to be listing out all relevant fantasy football players each week and bucketing them into tiers.

Take some of the guesswork out of setting our lineups weekly, I’ll be leveraging thousands of slate simulations that are based on numberFire’s player projections with dynamic measures for variance, such as quarterback rushing, running back receiving, and receiver target depth.

The results will boil down to three tiers: players we should be confident about starting, players we can consider starting whenever we don’t have better alternatives but who aren’t must-plays, and players we should try to bench whenever we do have better alternatives (i.e. players listed above them on the list).

These players are listed in order of frequency of hitting the stated threshold (i.e. QB12, RB24, WR24, and TE12 performances), and higher on the list means more able to start.

The groupings reflect a 12-team, single-quarterback league with the following hypothetical in mind: if I had other viable options on my bench or the waiver wire, should I start this player this week?

Players not listed should be presumed sit-worthy in a shallow or standard-sized league, and all fantasy points references and rankings reflect half-PPR scoring.


Start with confidence:

— Justin Herbert vs. SEA (75%)

— Lamar Jackson vs. CLE (72%)

— Patrick Mahomes at SF (69%)

— Joe Burrow vs. ATL (66%)

— Dak Prescott vs. DET (56%)

— Geno Smith at LAC (56%)

— Kyler Murray vs. NO (55%)

— Derek Carr vs. HOU (53%)

— Tom Brady at CAR (51%)

— Tua Tagovailoa vs. PIT (51%)

Consider if needed:

— Aaron Rodgers at WSH (49%)

— Russell Wilson vs. NYJ (45% at full; 9% at half)

— Marcus Mariota at CIN (43%)

— Daniel Jones at JAC (43%)

— Mac Jones vs. CHI (41%)

— Matt Ryan at TEN (38%)

— Ryan Tannehill vs. IND (37%)

— Trevor Lawrence vs. NYG (37%)

— Jimmy Garoppolo vs. KC (36%)

— Jared Goff at DAL (35%)

Bench if possible:

Jameis Winston at ARI (33%); Jacoby Brissett at BAL (32%); Justin Fields at NE (32%); Taylor Heinicke vs. GB (30%); Davis Mills at LV (30%); Zach Wilson at DEN (30%); - Mitch Trubisky at MIA (7%); Kenny Pickett at MIA (6%).

Russell Wilson has an initial partial projection because of a hamstring injury. If he is projected as a full-go, then he is rating out as 45% likely for a top-12 week.

If Mac Jones does not play, Bailey Zappe is rating as a 29% play.

Even at a full projection, Jameis Winston is a preferred sit candidate; the same would apply to Andy Dalton.

Kenny Pickett and Mitch Trubisky are initially projected for a workload split. They’re not QB1 options in shallow leagues either way.

The bye week quarterbacks — Josh Allen, Jalen Hurts, Matthew Stafford, and Kirk Cousins — are particularly impactful for Week 7. That’s two stars and two quality starters. There are still a handful of surefire options even without them, but that does leave Tier 2 looking pretty long — and a bit shaky. That said, we still have nearly a dozen quarterbacks in the confident start tier, so you likely have one of them rostered and can avoid the drop-off.

The model still likes Aaron Rodgers well enough. He has had a tough schedule so far, and according to our Passing Net Expected Points (NEP) metric, which is numberFire’s expected points model, Rodgers has played just below expectation once accounting for opponents faced. Only one of the defenses he’s squared off with thus far has ranked outside the top 20 in adjusted pass defense (per our numbers). The Washington Commanders, his Week 7 opponent, are 23rd. In the lone game with a comparable matchup to this one, Rodgers still had only 195 yards and no touchdowns against the Minnesota Vikings. Consider looking elsewhere if you have the option to do so this week, but don’t go too far down the list to avoid Rodgers.

Although Trevor Lawrence hasn’t been consistently fantasy-friendly, he is shaping up as a potential streamer for needy teams. He faces a New York Giants defense that ranks 18th in adjusted pass defense, a tier in which Lawrence’s opponents have lived in 2022.

Excluding a single matchup against a top-five defense, Lawrence has played five games against teams ranked 16th through 23rd in adjusted pass defense. In them, he’s averaged 18.7 fantasy points while putting up a 52.5% passing success rate and 0.17 Passing NEP per drop-back. The NFL average this season is only 0.06, so there are still reasons to be interested in Lawrence as a high-end QB2 in fantasy formats.

Jared Goff returns from a bye to face a stingy Dallas Cowboys defense. The Cowboys rank top five in aggregate fantasy stats allowed to opposing quarterbacks. Goff, in two games against top-12 pass defenses, has averaged just 12.8 fantasy points with a per-game stat line of 222.0 yards, 1.0 touchdowns, 1.0 interceptions, and -0.19 Passing NEP per drop-back.

We might be eager to want to rush back to this offense, but take a look at some other names above him if possible.


Start with confidence:

— Derrick Henry vs. IND (83%)

— Christian McCaffrey vs. TB (82%)

— Jonathan Taylor at TEN (80% if full; 40% at half)

— Josh Jacobs vs. HOU (78%)

— Austin Ekeler vs. SEA (77%)

— Saquon Barkley at JAC (76%)

— Leonard Fournette at CAR (75%)

— Joe Mixon vs. ATL (74%)

— Alvin Kamara at ARI (68%)

— Ezekiel Elliott vs. DET (66%)

— Nick Chubb at BAL (66%)

— Rhamondre Stevenson vs. CHI (64%)

— Aaron Jones at WSH (64%)

— Breece Hall at DEN (63%)

— Dameon Pierce at LV (62%)

— David Montgomery at NE (62%)

— Kenneth Walker III at LAC (60%)

— D’Andre Swift at DAL (60% at full; 23% at half)

Consider if needed:

— Raheem Mostert vs. PIT (59%)

— Najee Harris at MIA (52%)

— Jamaal Williams at DAL (51% without Swift; 26% with Swift)

— Jeff Wilson vs. KC (51%)

— A.J. Dillon at WSH (50%)

— Travis Etienne vs. NYG (49%)

— Eno Benjamin vs. NO (44%)

— Clyde Edwards-Helaire at SF (43%)

— Tony Pollard vs. DET (42%)

— Brian Robinson vs. GB (42%)

— Caleb Huntley at CIN (41%)

— James Robinson vs. NYG (40%)

Bench if possible:

Melvin Gordon vs. NYJ (39%); Tyler Allgeier at CIN (38%); J.K. Dobbins vs. CLE (38%); Kareem Hunt at BAL (38%); Antonio Gibson vs. GB (32%); Nyheim Hines at TEN (30%); Mike Boone vs. NYJ (29%); Rex Burkhead at LV (29%); Michael Carter at DEN (26%); J.D. McKissic vs. GB (21%); Rachaad White at CAR (21%); Latavius Murray vs. NYJ (20%).

Jonathan Taylor was limited in practice on Thursday and Friday for Week 6, but was ruled out before last Sunday. At a half workload, he is projected for a 40% top-24 rate. At a full workload, he is at 80%.

With the Detroit Lions on a bye in Week 6, we didn’t learn much about the status of D’Andre Swift. He is initially projected at half of his usual workload, but bumps up to 60% if projected fully.

The snap rate for Raheem Mostert scaled back to 62.5% last week, but he was on the injury report last week, so that might have had something to do with it. We’ll see how he progresses this week. Still, we’re not in a position to scoff at a majority snap rate from any running back, and Mostert has played on at least half of the Miami Dolphins’ snaps in five straight games and on at least 60.0% in three consecutive. In that three-game stretch as a more involved piece in the Miami offense, Mostert is averaging 15.7 carries, 2.7 targets, and 83.7 yards from scrimmage for 11.0 half-PPR points.

We should be cautious with Jeff Wilson if possible. In Week 5, Wilson had 132 scrimmage yards on 22 carries and two targets while playing 57.4% of the San Francisco 49ers’ offensive snaps. In Week 6, the Niners trailed, and his role scaled back to a 50.9% snap rate, a workload that yielded seven carries and one target for just 25 total yards. This week, the rushing matchup against the Kansas City Chiefs is enviable (they’re 24th in rushing success rate allowed to opposing backs). However, the likelihood of playing from behind means that we could see more of a Week 6 role for Wilson than what he had in Week 5. Just think before locking him in.

Can we finally start Tony Pollard? Maybe. It depends on the expectations. Pollard feels very involved in the Dallas Cowboys’ offense, and that offense should be getting Dak Prescott back under center this week.

Pollard is yet to play on more than 54.7% of the team’s snaps, and his high-water mark since Week 2 is just 42.6% while Ezekiel Elliott maintains a majority-back role. On a positive note, Pollard’s snaps are more productive than most: he gets a carry or target on 45.8% of his snaps (compared to 45.1% for Elliott and 38.8% as a position-wide average). The matchup with the Detroit Lions is very promising as well. They’re allowing 0.99 rushing yards over expectation to opposing backs as well as a 51.3% rushing success rate, each of those ranking 29th in the NFL. Both Elliott and Pollard are flex-worthy plays in this spot, and the model loves Elliott even more than that.


Start with confidence:

— Deebo Samuel vs. KC (87%)

— Davante Adams vs. HOU (82%)

— Ja’Marr Chase vs. ATL (72%)

— CeeDee Lamb vs. DET (65%)

— Tyreek Hill vs. PIT (64%)

— Mike Williams vs. SEA (62%)

— Tyler Lockett at LAC (59%)

— D.K. Metcalf at LAC (57%)

— Amon-Ra St. Brown at DAL (57%)

— Courtland Sutton vs. NYJ (55%)

— Jaylen Waddle vs. PIT (55%)

— Mike Evans at CAR (54%)

— DeAndre Hopkins vs. NO (54%)

— Amari Cooper at BAL (53%)

— Chris Olave at ARI (53%)

— Brandin Cooks at LV (53%)

Consider if needed:

— Keenan Allen vs. SEA (49% at full; 10% at half)

— Michael Pittman Jr. at TEN (49%)

— Christian Kirk vs. NYG (49%)

— Chris Godwin at CAR (49%)

— Tee Higgins vs. ATL (48%)

— Diontae Johnson at MIA (46%)

— Jerry Jeudy vs. NYJ (43%)

— Drake London at CIN (43%)

— Allen Lazard at WSH (43%)

— Jakobi Meyers vs. CHI (41%)

— Robert Woods vs. IND (40%)

— JuJu Smith-Schuster at SF (37%)

— Marquez Valdes-Scantling at SF (34%)

— Brandon Aiyuk vs. KC (33%)

— George Pickens at MIA (33%)

— D.J. Moore vs. TB (32%)

— Devin Duvernay vs. CLE (32%)

— Donovan Peoples-Jones at BAL (31%)

— Garrett Wilson at DEN (30%)

— Michael Gallup vs. DET (30%)

Bench if possible:

Chase Claypool at MIA (29%); Terry McLaurin vs. GB (28%); Marvin Jones vs. NYG (28%); Tyler Boyd vs. ATL (27%); Alec Pierce at TEN (26%); Zay Jones vs. NYG (26%); Romeo Doubs at WSH (25%); Darnell Mooney at NE (25%); Nico Collins at LV (24%); Marquez Callaway at ARI (22%); Corey Davis at DEN (21%); Curtis Samuel vs. GB (20%); Hunter Renfrow vs. HOU (20%).

Keenan Allen is projected at a half workload. With a full return, his top-24 odds are 49%.

Brandon Aiyuk and the rest of the 49ers had some increased passing volume their way in a negative game script in Week 6. Aiyuk handled 11 targets for 83 yards and two touchdowns against the Atlanta Falcons. The 49ers are underdogs this week against the Chiefs, and that should lead to more volume for the pass-catchers again. San Francisco has a 53.1% pass rate so far this season, ranking them 25th in the league. When trailing by seven or fewer (and excluding two-minute drill possessions), their pass rate is up to 65.6%, and their pass rate over expectation is +3.3%. It may not be point-chasing to go after Aiyuk again this week.

On the other side of that game, we have a few options with the Chiefs’ pass-catchers who are borderline plays once again. Last week saw JuJu Smith-Schuster rack up 113 yards and a touchdown on his five targets. He did that by having a perfect catch rate and accruing 81 yards after the catch. He entered last week with only 136 yards after the catch (27.2 per game) on the year.

Marquez Valdes-Scantling, meanwhile, didn’t catch any of his three targets a week after setting season highs in catches (six), targets (eight), and yards (90).

Collectively, their matchup isn’t ideal, as the 49ers are 10th in adjusted fantasy points per target allowed to receivers. However, they are allowing a catch rate over expectation of +2.0% and may have had some early touchdown luck. Don’t rule them out just because of a tough on-paper matchup.

I’m still seeing the Washington Commanders’ pass-catchers ranked well most places, but the simulations are noticeably lower on them. Terry McLaurin and Curtis Samuel will see downgraded efficiency with Taylor Heinicke under center in Week 7 and beyond.

Heinicke’s 2021 season featured more than 500 drop-backs, but just 0.01 Passing NEP per drop-back and a 45.0% passing success rate, marks that were 0.09 and 2.1 points below the position average, respectively.

In 2021, Washington ranked 25th in pass rate, as well. They’ve been a bit pass-heavier to start 2022 with Carson Wentz, but we could see that volume change again now that Heinicke is back under center. Even a matchup against the Green Bay Packers (31st in adjusted fantasy points per target allowed to receivers) isn’t enough to make them priority starts over a lot of their peers.


Start with confidence:

— Mark Andrews vs. CLE (82%)

— Travis Kelce at SF (82%)

— Gerald Everett vs. SEA (57%)

— Kyle Pitts at CIN (56%)

— George Kittle vs. KC (55%)

— Darren Waller vs. HOU (53% at full; 26% at half)

Consider if needed:

— Zach Ertz vs. NO (42%)

— David Njoku at BAL (42%)

— Pat Freiermuth at MIA (42%)

— T.J. Hockenson at DAL (40%)

— Dalton Schultz vs. DET (40%)

— Hayden Hurst vs. ATL (39%)

— Robert Tonyan at WSH (38%)

— Noah Fant at LAC (33%)

— Evan Engram vs. NYG (31%)

— Daniel Bellinger at JAC (30%)

Bench if possible:

Tyler Conklin at DEN (28%); Hunter Henry vs. CHI (27%); Isaiah Likely vs. CLE (25%); Logan Thomas vs. GB (25%); Cole Kmet at NE (24%); Brevin Jordan at LV (24%); Mike Gesicki vs. PIT (22%); Will Dissly at LAC (21%); Adam Trautman at ARI (20%); Taysom Hill at ARI (20%); Cade Otton at CAR (19% assuming Cameron Brate is out).

Darren Waller was limited in Week 5 with a hamstring injury; there has been no update since then given the Las Vegas Raiders’ bye.

Pat Freiermuth could to be cleared for Sunday.

Despite a full practice on Friday entering Week 6, Dalton Schultz did not play on Sunday night.

A larger role existed for Robert Tonyan in Week 6 after Randall Cobb’s injury. Tonyan finished Week 6 with 12 targets for 90 yards. That equated to a 27.3% target share. We can’t simply extrapolate that rate out for the rest of the way, but the context around it is elite: it would rank him behind just Mark Andrews (33.1%) on the season among the position.

The Seattle Seahawks’ receivers were limited in Week 6, and that funneled targets to the rest of the team, but Noah Fant has had an uptick in market share for the past two games (20.8% and 23.3%). In that span, he’s averaging 6.0 targets and 47.0 yards. On paper, the Los Angeles Chargers pose a difficult matchup (they’re tops in adjusted fantasy points per target allowed to tight ends), but have also allowed a catch rate over expectation of +6.0% to the position.

Since a role increase in Week 3, Daniel Bellinger has been a viable fantasy football tight end. Week 3 was the first time he reached a 40.0% route rate, and it’s climbed in each game since: 40.5%, 41.2%, 50.0%, and 80.6%. Since Week 3, Bellinger ranks 12th among the position in target share (16.3%) and sixth in red zone target share (30.0%).


Recommended Videos